lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Apr]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair Scheduler [CFS]


    On Wed, 18 Apr 2007, Matt Mackall wrote:
    >
    > Why is X special? Because it does work on behalf of other processes?
    > Lots of things do this. Perhaps a scheduler should focus entirely on
    > the implicit and directed wakeup matrix and optimizing that
    > instead[1].

    I 100% agree - the perfect scheduler would indeed take into account where
    the wakeups come from, and try to "weigh" processes that help other
    processes make progress more. That would naturally give server processes
    more CPU power, because they help others

    I don't believe for a second that "fairness" means "give everybody the
    same amount of CPU". That's a totally illogical measure of fairness. All
    processes are _not_ created equal.

    That said, even trying to do "fairness by effective user ID" would
    probably already do a lot. In a desktop environment, X would get as much
    CPU time as the user processes, simply because it's in a different
    protection domain (and that's really what "effective user ID" means: it's
    not about "users", it's really about "protection domains").

    And "fairness by euid" is probably a hell of a lot easier to do than
    trying to figure out the wakeup matrix.

    Linus
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-04-18 16:51    [W:0.021 / U:1.264 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site