lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Apr]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair Scheduler [CFS]
    On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 11:09:55PM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
    >> All things are not equal; they all have different properties. I like

    On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 08:15:03AM +0200, Nick Piggin wrote:
    > Exactly. So we have to explore those properties and evaluate performance
    > (in all meanings of the word). That's only logical.

    Any chance you'd be willing to put down a few thoughts on what sorts
    of standards you'd like to set for both correctness (i.e. the bare
    minimum a scheduler implementation must do to be considered valid
    beyond not oopsing) and performance metrics (i.e. things that produce
    numbers for each scheduler you can compare to say "this scheduler is
    better than this other scheduler at this.").


    -- wli
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-04-17 08:31    [W:4.077 / U:0.236 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site