Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 17 Apr 2007 11:53:03 +0200 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [patch] CFS (Completely Fair Scheduler), v2 |
| |
* Peter Williams <pwil3058@bigpond.net.au> wrote:
> Have you considered using rq->raw_weighted_load instead of > rq->nr_running in calculating fair_clock? This would take the nice > value (or RT priority) of the other tasks into account when > determining what's fair. > > Peter
> PS You'd have to change the migration thread's load_weight from 0 to 1 > in order to prevent divide by zero without having to explicitly check > for it every time.
yeah - nice idea, i'll try this.
Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |