lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Apr]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Why kmem_cache_free occupy CPU for more than 10 seconds?
I got some new information:
Before soft lockup message is out, we have:
[root@nsgsh-dhcp-149 home]# cat /proc/slabinfo |grep buffer_head
buffer_head 10927942 10942560 120 32 1 : tunables 32
16 8 : slabdata 341955 341955 6 : globalstat 37602996 11589379
1174373 6 0 1 6918 12166031 1013708
: cpustat 35254590 2350698 13610965 907286
Then after buffer_head is freed, we have:
[root@nsgsh-dhcp-149 home]# cat /proc/slabinfo |grep buffer_head
buffer_head 9542 36384 120 32 1 : tunables 32 16
8 : slabdata 1137 1137 245 : globalstat 37602996 11589379
1174373 6 0 1 6983 20507478
1708818 : cpustat 35254625 2350704 16027174 1068367
Does this huge number of buffer_head cause the soft lockup?

Thanks,
Forrest

On 4/11/07, Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi> wrote:
> On 4/11/07, Zhao Forrest <forrest.zhao@gmail.com> wrote:
> > We're using RHEL5 with kernel version 2.6.18-8.el5.
> > When doing a stress test on raw device for about 3-4 hours, we found
> > the soft lockup message in dmesg.
> > I know we're not reporting the bug on the latest kernel, but does any
> > expert know if this is the known issue in old kernel? Or why
> > kmem_cache_free occupy CPU for more than 10 seconds?
>
> Sounds like slab corruption. CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB should tell you more.
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-04-11 11:57    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans