[lkml]   [2007]   [Apr]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [KJ]remove SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED

    On Apr 10 2007 17:25, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
    >On Tue, 10 Apr 2007, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
    >> On Apr 10 2007 23:46, Milind Arun Choudhary wrote:
    >> >"use spin_lock_init instead of SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED"
    >> Fact is, we cannot remove SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED. It's needed for
    >> variables outside functions:
    >> static spinlock_t foobar = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED;
    >but that's where you would use the more explicit
    >__RAW_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED, no? AFAIK, you really can remove the macro
    >SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED in its entirety.

    I don't remember LDD speaking about __RAW_*. (And other than not
    having looked into the code to date, I don't know the difference.)

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-04-10 23:33    [W:0.024 / U:39.728 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site