[lkml]   [2007]   [Apr]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [KJ]remove SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED

On Apr 10 2007 17:25, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>On Tue, 10 Apr 2007, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>> On Apr 10 2007 23:46, Milind Arun Choudhary wrote:
>> >"use spin_lock_init instead of SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED"
>> Fact is, we cannot remove SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED. It's needed for
>> variables outside functions:
>> static spinlock_t foobar = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED;
>but that's where you would use the more explicit
>__RAW_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED, no? AFAIK, you really can remove the macro
>SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED in its entirety.

I don't remember LDD speaking about __RAW_*. (And other than not
having looked into the code to date, I don't know the difference.)

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-04-10 23:33    [W:0.052 / U:0.256 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site