lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Apr]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 07/16] kconfig-dynamic-frequency.diff

    On Apr 1 2007 14:52, Kyle Moffett wrote:
    >
    > On Apr 01, 2007, at 14:42:59, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
    >> But I would have to ask: Why do we need 100/250/300/1000 if there
    >> is anyway an input field for the user to enter - s/he should read
    >> the help text for Known Good values, should not s/he?
    >
    > Actually, probably what should be done is make the "HZ_CUSTOM"
    > option depend on EXPERIMENTAL / EMBEDDED / "EXPERT" /
    > "I_KNOW_WHAT_THE_HELL_IM_DOING" or some other equivalent option,

    EXPERIMENTAL is most often enabled by distributors.
    And we are still missing our much-needed CONFIG_EXPERT :-(

    > because a wrong choice for HZ has the potential to really screw up
    > a system. For example, 10000+ would make most systems spend a
    > significant portion of their time processing timer interrupts and

    Point taken. Ehm, I already once tried making a 10000-Hz kernel
    around 2.6.13-15 or so. It did not compile because some header files had
    #error directives for HZ >= 1536. (jiffies.h:33 if you want
    to know.) IIRC there also was another place somewhere in networking
    code that #errors out at >8192.


    Jan
    --
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-04-01 21:07    [W:2.493 / U:0.060 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site