[lkml]   [2007]   [Apr]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [lm-sensors] Could the k8temp driver be interfering with ACPI?

> > Actually for the acpi stuff... we might wrap ACPI interpretter with a
> > semaphore that needs to be taken before starting any AML code. Then
> > just make sure sensors take same semaphore?
> I like the idea, it should work as long as we are guaranteed that all
> the hwmon device accesses happen in the AML code? I'm not familiar with
> ACPI, so you tell me.
> In practice it's rather the SMBus drivers which will need to take the
> lock, as this is what the AML code will access (for SMBus-based
> hardware monitoring drivers.) For non-SMBus based hardware monitoring
> drivers, indeed the driver itself should take it. We will have to pay
> attention to deadlocks on systems with multiple hardware monitoring
> chips and/or SMBus channels.
> Can you please provide a patch implementing your proposal in acpi? Then
> I could implement the i2c/hwmon part on some selected drivers and start
> testing real world scenarii.

I'm sorry, but I do not have time for a patch.... and I'm not really
acpi expert, anyway. Ask Len?
(cesky, pictures)
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-04-01 17:43    [W:0.085 / U:2.320 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site