lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Mar]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 0/2] resource control file system - aka containers on top of nsproxy!
    On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 01:53:57AM +0100, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
    > > The real trick is that I believe these groupings are designed to
    > > be something you can setup on login and then not be able to switch
    > > out of. Which means we can't use sessions and process groups as the
    > > grouping entities as those have different semantics.
    >
    > precisely, once you are inside a resource container, you
    > must not have the ability to modify its limits, and to
    > some degree, you should not know about the actual available
    > resources, but only about the artificial limits

    From non-container workload management perspective, we do desire dynamic
    manipulation of limits associated with a group and also the ability to move
    tasks across resource-classes/groups.

    --
    Regards,
    vatsa
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-03-09 19:15    [W:4.158 / U:0.128 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site