[lkml]   [2007]   [Mar]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [patch 2/3] fs: introduce perform_write aop
    Hi Nick,

    sorry for my later reply, this has been on my to answer list for the last
    month and I only managed to get back to it now.

    On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 02:07:36PM +0100, Nick Piggin wrote:
    > Add a new "perform_write" aop, which replaces prepare_write and commit_write
    > as a single call to copy a given amount of userdata at the given offset. This
    > is more flexible, because the implementation can determine how to best handle
    > errors, or multi-page ranges (eg. it may use a gang lookup), and only requires
    > one call into the fs.

    I really like this idea, especially for avoiding to call into the allocator
    for every block. Have you contacted the reiser4 folks whether this would
    superceed their batch_write op completely?

    > One problem with this interface is that it cannot be used to write into the
    > filesystem by any means other than already-initialised buffers via iovecs. So
    > prepare/commit have to stay around for non-user data...

    Actually I think that's a a good thing to a certain extent. It reminds
    us that all other users are horrible abuse of the interface. I'd even
    go so far as to make batch_write a callback that the filesystem passes
    to generic_file_aio_write to make clear it's not a generic thing but
    a helper. (It's not a generic thing because it's the upper layer writing
    into the pagecache, not a pagecache to fs below operation).

    The still leaves open on how to get rid of ->prepare_write and ->commit_write
    compltely, and for that we'll probably need ->kernel_read and ->kernel_write
    file operations. But that's a step you shouldn't consider yet when doing
    this work.

    > Another thing is that it seems to be less able to be implemented in generic,
    > reusable code. It should be possible to introduce a new 2-op interface (or
    > maybe just a new error handler op) which can be used correctly in generic code.

    We should be able to find a nice abstraction for this, see my next mails.

    > + /*
    > + * perform_write replaces prepare and commit_write callbacks.
    > + */

    This is a rather useless comment :) Better remove it and add a proper
    descriptions to Documentation/filesystems/vfs.txt and

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-03-09 11:41    [W:0.026 / U:1.840 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site