lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Mar]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: + stupid-hack-to-make-mainline-build.patch added to -mm tree
    Chris Wright wrote:
    > I agree with that, but I think that's esp. for things like create and launch
    > new vcpu. The IPI bit I'm not as clear on, nor running this all on native
    > as well.
    >

    Well, native would fall back to using the existing arch/i386 versions of
    those functions, so that's reasonably straightforward. There'll need to
    be a bit of internal rearrangement so that the Xen code can call in to
    do things like set up the pda/gdt and other bits of CPU state.

    I don't think IPI is especially interesting in itself, is it? It's a
    necessary mechanism to implement smp_call_function(), but Xen can do IPI
    without having to invoke any of the existing apic-based IPI code. The
    other main user of IPI is cross-cpu tlb shootdown, but Xen has much more
    efficient mechanisms than IPI for that (so we'll need to make the tlb
    pv_ops interface a little wider to pass down a cpuset).

    J
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-03-08 20:55    [W:0.022 / U:61.148 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site