[lkml]   [2007]   [Mar]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] x86_64 RESTORE_CONTEXT missing '\n'
On Thursday 08 March 2007 18:44, Dave Jiang wrote:

> In spite of kgdb, shouldn't it have that \n anyways in case some other code
> gets added in the future after the macro? Or are you saying that there should
> never be any code ever after that macro?

Sure if there is mainline code added after that macro we add the \n.
But only if it makes sense to add code there, which it didn't in kgdb.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-03-08 19:41    [W:0.060 / U:2.996 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site