lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Mar]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Request change in behaviour of capability inheritance.

--- rgarcia@kotasoft.com wrote:
> I think that the current behaviour of capability
> inheritance across exec()
> is not optimal.
>
> The current behaviour consists in all effective and
> permitted capabilities
> are cleared across a exec(). This is because it
> seems to be intended that
> in the future the executable files have a set of
> "allowed" and "forced"
> capabilities.

File based capabilities are the same
effective, permitted, and inheritable
sets that the process has. Unless the
thinking has shifted over the last couple
weeks (it happens from time to time)
the inheritable set is what you're
missing.



Casey Schaufler
casey@schaufler-ca.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-03-08 17:27    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans