[lkml]   [2007]   [Mar]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/2] resource control file system - aka containers on top of nsproxy!
"Paul Menage" <> writes:

> No, Sam was saying that nsproxy should be the object that all resource
> controllers hook off.

I think implementation wise this tends to make sense.
However it should have nothing to do with semantics.

If we have a lot of independent resource controllers. Placing the
pointer to their data structures directly in nsproxy instead of in
task_struct sounds like a reasonable idea but it should not be user

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-03-08 00:21    [W:0.157 / U:19.364 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site