lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Mar]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: + stupid-hack-to-make-mainline-build.patch added to -mm tree
    Ingo Molnar wrote:
    > /For you/ it's certainly no big deal, you dont have to fix it up and you
    > dont have to keep it flexible ;)
    >

    How flexible does it need to be? Its a simple time source and event
    driver. How flexible does the pit driver need to be? It's just a small
    leaf node hanging off a large existing piece of kernel infrastructure.

    > and really, i'm not expecting miracles, i've never seen any hardware
    > vendor argue /against/ support for their own hardware =B-)
    >

    And since when has it been kernel policy to argue against including a
    well written, self-contained, vendor-provided driver for a piece of
    hardware?

    J
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-03-07 19:31    [W:2.563 / U:0.036 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site