Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 07 Mar 2007 10:28:28 -0800 | From | Jeremy Fitzhardinge <> | Subject | Re: + stupid-hack-to-make-mainline-build.patch added to -mm tree |
| |
Ingo Molnar wrote: > /For you/ it's certainly no big deal, you dont have to fix it up and you > dont have to keep it flexible ;) >
How flexible does it need to be? Its a simple time source and event driver. How flexible does the pit driver need to be? It's just a small leaf node hanging off a large existing piece of kernel infrastructure.
> and really, i'm not expecting miracles, i've never seen any hardware > vendor argue /against/ support for their own hardware =B-) >
And since when has it been kernel policy to argue against including a well written, self-contained, vendor-provided driver for a piece of hardware?
J - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |