Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 06 Mar 2007 11:55:25 +0200 | From | Avi Kivity <> | Subject | Re: Xen & VMI? |
| |
Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > Oh, and btw: What was the reason why kvm paravirtualization doesn't use > the vmi interface? > >
There actually was proof of concept code to do just that (by Anthony Liguori). For Linux, I feel paravirt_ops is superior as we can extend it if something is missing. If VMI is adopted by non-Linux guests, we may support it as a quick way to add paravirt support for those guests.
-- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |