Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 06 Mar 2007 08:23:10 +0100 | From | Pierre Ossman <> | Subject | Re: [BUG] sdhci regression in 2.6.21-rc2 |
| |
Andrew Morton wrote: > Oh, it's just a pain in the ass. Please don't do it lightly - if there's a > really good reason then OK. >
The mmc code is a mess (mostly my fault for the addition of SD support) and I'm trying to break things apart to clear the code up. That unfortunately meant moving files around.
> Plus it helps if the massive file move isn't left sitting in some external > tree for months. I mean, it's usually a trivial thing, so do it just a > week before the pull is due. > >
My goal with putting it in -mm was to give people a chance to cry bloody murder before I merged the stuff (which I intend to do immediately post 2.6.21). The changes are all over the place, so to ease my mind I prefer to have it simmer for a while.
As to making your life easier, send patches to the mmc layer my way and I'll handle the conflicts. I made the mess so it's only fair that I have to clean it up.
> But whatever. What are we going to do about $SUBJECT? >
It should go in now, along with a fix to unregister the interrupt. I have a bunch of fixes I intend to push to Linus today and I'll include this in that group.
Rgds
-- -- Pierre Ossman
Linux kernel, MMC maintainer http://www.kernel.org PulseAudio, core developer http://pulseaudio.org rdesktop, core developer http://www.rdesktop.org
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |