lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Mar]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC] div64_64 support
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 03:57:14PM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On 03 Mar 2007 03:31:52 +0100
> Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote:
>
> > Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org> writes:
> >
> > > Here is another way to handle the 64 bit divide case.
> > > It allows full 64 bit divide by adding the support routine
> > > GCC needs.
> >
> > Not supplying that was intentional by Linus so that people
> > think twice (or more often) before they using such expensive
> > operations. A plain / looks too innocent.
> >
> > Is it really needed by CUBIC anyways? It uses it for getting
> > the cubic root, but the algorithm recommended by Hacker's Delight
> > (great book) doesn't use any divisions at all. Probably better
> > to use a better algorithm without divisions.
> >
>
> I tried the code from Hacker's Delight.
> It is cool, but performance is CPU (and data) dependent:

I did too. My experiences were mixed: on 32bit it was slower,
on 64bit faster on average. Strangely the 32bit version ran
faster again without -fomit-frame-pointer, so it's likely
some funny interaction with 32bit long long code generation.
The difference is never more than 100 cycles so it shouldn't
be a big issue either way.

For some input arguments (<1% in my testing)
it also gave an answer 1 off from the existing code,
but I don't think that's a problem.

But more importantly during testing I found that the cubic
code gives a division by zero for input arguments >2^43. If you
have a system with >16TB of memory this could actually be a remotely
exploitable bug :)

I still think it's a good idea to switch to the new function,
especially since it's shorter code.

Here's the patch. Note I didn't verify it with real large window
TCP operations; only unit testing.

-Andi

Use Hacker's delight cube root algorithm in cubic TCP

Shorter code and fixes a theoretically remote exploitable bug.

Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>


Index: linux-2.6.21-rc1-net/net/ipv4/tcp_cubic.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.21-rc1-net.orig/net/ipv4/tcp_cubic.c
+++ linux-2.6.21-rc1-net/net/ipv4/tcp_cubic.c
@@ -93,51 +93,24 @@ static void bictcp_init(struct sock *sk)
tcp_sk(sk)->snd_ssthresh = initial_ssthresh;
}

-/* 64bit divisor, dividend and result. dynamic precision */
-static inline u_int64_t div64_64(u_int64_t dividend, u_int64_t divisor)
+static u32 cubic_root(u64 x)
{
- u_int32_t d = divisor;
-
- if (divisor > 0xffffffffULL) {
- unsigned int shift = fls(divisor >> 32);
-
- d = divisor >> shift;
- dividend >>= shift;
- }
-
- /* avoid 64 bit division if possible */
- if (dividend >> 32)
- do_div(dividend, d);
- else
- dividend = (uint32_t) dividend / d;
-
- return dividend;
-}
-
-/*
- * calculate the cubic root of x using Newton-Raphson
- */
-static u32 cubic_root(u64 a)
-{
- u32 x, x1;
-
- /* Initial estimate is based on:
- * cbrt(x) = exp(log(x) / 3)
- */
- x = 1u << (fls64(a)/3);
-
- /*
- * Iteration based on:
- * 2
- * x = ( 2 * x + a / x ) / 3
- * k+1 k k
- */
- do {
- x1 = x;
- x = (2 * x + (uint32_t) div64_64(a, x*x)) / 3;
- } while (abs(x1 - x) > 1);
-
- return x;
+ int s;
+ u32 y;
+ u64 b;
+ u64 bs;
+
+ y = 0;
+ for (s = 63; s >= 0; s -= 3) {
+ y = 2 * y;
+ b = 3 * y * (y+1) + 1;
+ bs = b << s;
+ if (x >= bs && (b == (bs>>s))) { /* avoid overflow */
+ x -= bs;
+ y++;
+ }
+ }
+ return y;
}

/*
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-03-06 14:37    [W:0.078 / U:0.788 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site