Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 6 Mar 2007 03:09:27 -0800 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: 2.6.21-rc2-mm2 |
| |
On Tue, 6 Mar 2007 19:27:18 +0900 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> > Following panic ouccurred (always) on ia64/NUMA(with empty node.) > > Bug in here. > == > void move_native_irq(int irq) > { > struct irq_desc *desc = irq_desc + irq; > > if (likely(!(desc->status & IRQ_MOVE_PENDING))) > return; > > if (unlikely(desc->status & IRQ_DISABLED)) > return; > > desc->chip->mask(irq); <---------maybe this *mask* is NULL pointer > move_masked_irq(irq); > desc->chip->unmask(irq); > } > == > > Is "mask" always valid pointer ?
I can only find two `struct irq_chip's in arch/ia64 and they both have a .mask. And a .unmask. So perhaps that is a misreading of what oopsed.
There are no changes in kernel/irq/ in -mm. Are you sure mainline doesn't do this too?
Anyway, can you please take a closer look at exactly what pointer it is oopsing on?
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |