Messages in this thread | | | From | Al Boldi <> | Subject | Re: [test] hackbench.c interactivity results: vanilla versus | Date | Sat, 31 Mar 2007 07:58:15 +0300 |
| |
Mike Galbraith wrote: > Yesterday, I piddled around with tracking interactive backlog as a way > to detect when the load isn't really an interactive load, that's very > simple and has potential.
You may want to consider fixing latencies per nice relative to load, as the biggest problem with iab are huge latency delays, which exhibit themselves as starvation, caused by unfair timeslice management.
Thanks!
-- Al
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |