[lkml]   [2007]   [Mar]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch -mm 1/2] i386: add ptep_test_and_clear_{dirty,young}
On Sun, 25 Mar 2007, Zachary Amsden wrote:

> If you actually clear the bit, you need to:
> + pte_update_defer(vma->vm_mm, addr, ptep);
> The reason is, when updating PTEs, the hypervisor must be notified. Using
> atomic operations to do this is fine for all hypervisors I am aware of.
> However, for hypervisors which shadow page tables, if these PTE modifications
> are not trapped, you need a post-modification call to fulfill the update of
> the shadow page table.

Then why was ptep_test_and_clear_{dirty,young} ever removed in the first
place?? To gain the optimization of one fewer branch and introduce a hack
to advertise it's existance so the generic header file doesn't include its
own version?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-03-26 08:39    [W:0.062 / U:1.284 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site