[lkml]   [2007]   [Mar]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [rfc][patch] queued spinlocks (i386)
Nick Piggin writes:
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 11:04:18AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Nick Piggin <> wrote:
> >
> > > Implement queued spinlocks for i386. [...]
> >
> > isnt this patented by MS? (which might not worry you SuSE/Novell guys,
> > but it might be a worry for the rest of the world ;-)
> Hmm, it looks like they have implemented a system where the spinning
> cpu sleeps on a per-CPU variable rather than the lock itself, and
> the releasing cpu writes to that variable to wake it. They do this
> so that spinners don't continually perform exclusive->shared
> transitions on the lock cacheline. They call these things queued
> spinlocks. They don't seem to be very patent worthy either, but

Indeed, this technique is very well known. E.g., has a whole
section (3. Local-spin Algorithms) on them, citing papers from the 1990


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-03-24 16:57    [W:0.074 / U:2.708 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site