[lkml]   [2007]   [Mar]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [rfc][patch] queued spinlocks (i386)
Nick Piggin <npiggin <at>> writes:

> On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 11:04:18AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Nick Piggin <npiggin <at>> wrote:
> >
> > > Implement queued spinlocks for i386. [...]
> >
> > isnt this patented by MS? (which might not worry you SuSE/Novell guys,
> > but it might be a worry for the rest of the world
> I never thought a FIFO queue would be patentable.
> Do you have a reference to the patent number?

The ReactOS guys none the less, seem to have implemented queued spin locks - (see the HAL section.)

Now I haven't looked at the code to see if they are different from what MS has
patented but given that it's a clone of Windows, one would think at least from
the behavioral pov they are similar?


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-03-23 17:55    [W:0.091 / U:0.236 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site