Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 23 Mar 2007 15:15:55 +0000 (GMT) | From | Mel Gorman <> | Subject | Re: [patch] rfc: introduce /dev/hugetlb |
| |
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Mar 2007, Ken Chen wrote: >>> -#ifdef HAVE_ARCH_HUGETLB_UNMAPPED_AREA >>> -unsigned long hugetlb_get_unmapped_area(struct file *file, unsigned long >>> addr, >>> - unsigned long len, unsigned long pgoff, unsigned long flags); >>> -#else >>> -static unsigned long >>> +unsigned long >>> hugetlb_get_unmapped_area(struct file *file, unsigned long addr, >>> unsigned long len, unsigned long pgoff, unsigned long flags) >> > On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 03:03:57PM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote: >> What is going on here? Why do arches not get to specify a >> get_unmapped_area any more? > > Lack of compiletesting beyond x86-64 in all probability. >
Ok, this will go kablamo on Power then even if it compiles. I don't consider it a fundamental problem though. For the purposes of an RFC, it's grand and something that can be worked with.
-- Mel Gorman Part-time Phd Student Linux Technology Center University of Limerick IBM Dublin Software Lab - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |