Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 21 Mar 2007 14:29:42 -0700 (PDT) | From | Christoph Lameter <> | Subject | Re: [RFC 0/8] Cpuset aware writeback |
| |
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007, Ethan Solomita wrote:
> Christoph Lameter wrote: > > On Thu, 1 Feb 2007, Ethan Solomita wrote: > > > > > Hi Christoph -- has anything come of resolving the NFS / OOM concerns > > > that > > > Andrew Morton expressed concerning the patch? I'd be happy to see some > > > progress on getting this patch (i.e. the one you posted on 1/23) through. > > > > Peter Zilkstra addressed the NFS issue. I will submit the patch again as > > soon as the writeback code stabilizes a bit. > > I'm pinging to see if this has gotten anywhere. Are you ready to > resubmit? Do we have the evidence to convince Andrew that the NFS issues are > resolved and so this patch won't obscure anything?
The NFS patch went into Linus tree a couple of days ago and I have a new version ready with additional support to set per dirty ratios per cpu. There is some interest in adding more VM controls to this patch. I hope I can post the next rev by tomorrow.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |