[lkml]   [2007]   [Mar]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: dst_ifdown breaks infiniband?

    > > It should be cleared and we should be sure it will not be destroyed
    > > before quiescent state.
    > I'm confused. didn't you say dst_ifdown is called after quiescent state?

    Quiescent state should happen after dst->neighbour is invalidated.
    And this implies that all the users of dst->neighbour check validity
    after dereference and do not use it after quiescent state.

    > This does not sound like something that's likely to be accepted in 2.6.21, right?
    > Any simpler ideas?

    Well, if inifiniband destructor really needs to take that lock... no.
    Right now I do not see.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-03-18 21:21    [W:0.032 / U:3.076 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site