[lkml]   [2007]   [Mar]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: dst_ifdown breaks infiniband?

> > It should be cleared and we should be sure it will not be destroyed
> > before quiescent state.
> I'm confused. didn't you say dst_ifdown is called after quiescent state?

Quiescent state should happen after dst->neighbour is invalidated.
And this implies that all the users of dst->neighbour check validity
after dereference and do not use it after quiescent state.

> This does not sound like something that's likely to be accepted in 2.6.21, right?
> Any simpler ideas?

Well, if inifiniband destructor really needs to take that lock... no.
Right now I do not see.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-03-18 21:21    [W:0.145 / U:77.172 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site