[lkml]   [2007]   [Mar]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH 2/7] RSS controller core
    On Mon, 2007-03-12 at 22:04 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
    > So these mmapped pages will contiue to be shared across all guests. The
    > problem boils down to "which guest(s) get charged for each shared page".
    > A simple and obvious and easy-to-implement answer is "the guest which paged
    > it in". I think we should firstly explain why that is insufficient.

    My first worry was that this approach is unfair to the poor bastard that
    happened to get started up first. If we have a bunch of containerized
    web servers, the poor guy who starts Apache first will pay the price for
    keeping it in memory for everybody else.

    That said, I think this is naturally worked around. The guy charged
    unfairly will get reclaim started on himself sooner. This will tend to
    page out those pages that he was being unfairly charged for. Hopefully,
    they will eventually get pretty randomly (eventually evenly) spread
    among all users. We just might want to make sure that we don't allow
    ptes (or other new references) to be re-established to pages like this
    when we're trying to reclaim them. Either that, or force the next
    toucher to take ownership of the thing. But, that kind of arbitrary
    ownership transfer can't happen if we have rigidly defined boundaries
    for the containers.

    The other concern is that the memory load on the system doesn't come
    from the first user ("the guy who paged it in"). The long-term load
    comes from "the guy who keeps using it." The best way to exemplify this
    is somebody who read()s a page in, followed by another guy mmap()ing the
    same page. The guy who did the read will get charged, and the mmap()er
    will get a free ride. We could probably get an idea when this kind of
    stuff is happening by comparing page->count and page->_mapcount, but it
    certainly wouldn't be conclusive. But, does this kind of nonsense even
    happen in practice?

    -- Dave

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-03-13 18:29    [W:0.021 / U:23.148 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site