lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Mar]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 0/2] resource control file system - aka containers on top of nsproxy!
    On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 09:50:45PM +0530, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote:
    > On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 10:56:43AM -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
    > > What's wrong with that?
    >
    > I had been asking around on "what is the fundamental unit of res mgmt
    > for vservers" and the answer I got (from Herbert) was "all tasks that are
    > in the same pid namespace". From what you are saying above, it seems to
    > be that there is no such "fundamental" unit. It can be a random mixture
    > of tasks (taken across vservers) whose resource consumption needs to be
    > controlled. Is that correct?

    just means that the current Linux-VServer behaviour
    is a subset of that, no problem there as long as
    it really _is_ a subset :) we always like to provide
    more features in the future, no problem with that :)

    best,
    Herbert

    > > > echo "cid 2" > /dev/cpu/prof/tasks
    > >
    > > Adding that feature sounds fine,
    >
    > Ok yes ..that can be a optional feature.
    >
    > --
    > Regards,
    > vatsa
    > _______________________________________________
    > Containers mailing list
    > Containers@lists.osdl.org
    > https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-03-13 00:33    [W:6.365 / U:0.008 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site