lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Mar]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 0/2] resource control file system - aka containers on top of nsproxy!
On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 10:56:43AM -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> What's wrong with that?

I had been asking around on "what is the fundamental unit of res mgmt
for vservers" and the answer I got (from Herbert) was "all tasks that are
in the same pid namespace". From what you are saying above, it seems to
be that there is no such "fundamental" unit. It can be a random mixture
of tasks (taken across vservers) whose resource consumption needs to be
controlled. Is that correct?

> > echo "cid 2" > /dev/cpu/prof/tasks
>
> Adding that feature sounds fine,

Ok yes ..that can be a optional feature.

--
Regards,
vatsa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-03-12 17:17    [W:0.120 / U:0.532 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site