Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 10 Mar 2007 02:59:03 -0800 | From | William Lee Irwin III <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Fix sparc TIF_USEDFPU flag atomicity |
| |
On Sat, 10 Mar 2007 00:26:46 -0800, William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com> wrote: >> Oh dear. Could we bit a bit more idiomatic here? For instance, >> something like:
On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 12:29:44AM -0800, David Miller wrote: > Ok I pulled the sparc32 patch back out until there is some > consensus here :)
It's just a minor touch-up. If Mathieu is okay with it, I'd rather leave him as the author and just send along an Acked-by: with it. I'm not terribly attached to it, either. I just choked on my soda when I saw set_ti_thread_flag(task_thread_info(fpt), TI_USEDFPU) etc. go by. (Which reminds me, I really need to figure out how to consolidate the UP and SMP cases for all this.)
-- wli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |