[lkml]   [2007]   [Feb]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: NAK new drivers without proper power management?

    On Sat, 2007-02-10 at 03:42 +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote:
    > On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 08:57:49AM +1100, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
    > > Can we start to NAK new drivers that don't have proper power management
    > > implemented? There really is no excuse for writing a new driver and not
    > > putting .suspend and .resume methods in anymore, is there?
    > The PCI layer is able to deal with drivers that have no PM methods in
    > the most simple case.

    Yeah. I suppose we could use a pm_safe bit flag in struct device_driver
    and/or struct pci_driver. I have other things to do right now, but will
    seek to understand the relationship between those structs better later.



    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-02-10 05:45    [W:0.019 / U:76.208 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site