lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Feb]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
From
Date
Hi Dmitry!

On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 22:27 -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Hi Nigel,
>
> On Friday 09 February 2007 21:05, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> > [ 17.684475] Device driver serio0 lacks bus and class support for being resumed.
> > [ 17.684724] Device driver serio1 lacks bus and class support for being resumed.
> > [ 17.684874] Device driver psaux lacks bus and class support for being suspended or resumed.
> > [ 17.685015] Device driver serio2 lacks bus and class support for being resumed.
> > [ 18.373576] Device driver serio3 lacks bus and class support for being resumed.
> > [ 18.375666] Device driver serio4 lacks bus and class support for being resumed.
> >
>
> You should probably only warn if driver does not have resume method - not
> having suspend is quite valid if driver is able to restore state at resume
> without explicitely saving anything at suspend time.

Can do. Will do :)

Nigel

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-02-10 05:21    [W:0.060 / U:0.148 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site