[lkml]   [2007]   [Feb]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
On Sat, 2007-02-10 at 08:57 +1100, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> Hi.
> I don't think this is already done (feel free to correct me if I'm
> wrong)..
> Can we start to NAK new drivers that don't have proper power management
> implemented? There really is no excuse for writing a new driver and not
> putting .suspend and .resume methods in anymore, is there?

to a large degree, a device driver that doesn't suspend is better than
no device driver at all, right?
now.. if you want to make the core warn about it, that's very fair

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-02-09 23:19    [W:0.193 / U:4.216 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site