lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Feb]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
    From
    Date
    On Sat, 2007-02-10 at 08:57 +1100, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
    > Hi.
    >
    > I don't think this is already done (feel free to correct me if I'm
    > wrong)..
    >
    > Can we start to NAK new drivers that don't have proper power management
    > implemented? There really is no excuse for writing a new driver and not
    > putting .suspend and .resume methods in anymore, is there?


    to a large degree, a device driver that doesn't suspend is better than
    no device driver at all, right?
    now.. if you want to make the core warn about it, that's very fair

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-02-09 23:19    [W:0.019 / U:25.664 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site