[lkml]   [2007]   [Feb]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    Patch in this message
    Subject[PATCH 4/5] selinux: Enhance selinux to always ignore private inodes.

    From: Stephen Smalley <>

    Hmmm...turns out to not be quite enough, as the /proc/sys inodes aren't
    truly private to the fs, so we can run into them in a variety of
    security hooks beyond just the inode hooks, such as
    security_file_permission (when reading and writing them via the vfs
    helpers), security_sb_mount (when mounting other filesystems on
    directories in proc like binfmt_misc), and deeper within the security
    module itself (as in flush_unauthorized_files upon inheritance across
    execve). So I think we have to add an IS_PRIVATE() guard within
    SELinux, as below. Note however that the use of the private flag here
    could be confusing, as these inodes are _not_ private to the fs, are
    exposed to userspace, and security modules must implement the sysctl
    hook to get any access control over them.

    Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <>

    security/selinux/hooks.c | 3 +++
    1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

    diff --git a/security/selinux/hooks.c b/security/selinux/hooks.c
    index de16b9f..ff9fccc 100644
    --- a/security/selinux/hooks.c
    +++ b/security/selinux/hooks.c
    @@ -1077,6 +1077,9 @@ static int inode_has_perm(struct task_struct *tsk,
    struct inode_security_struct *isec;
    struct avc_audit_data ad;

    + if (unlikely (IS_PRIVATE (inode)))
    + return 0;
    tsec = tsk->security;
    isec = inode->i_security;

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-02-09 00:07    [W:0.021 / U:20.460 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site