lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Feb]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
SubjectRe: [patch 3/3] ext2: use perform_write aop
From
Date
Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> writes:

> Convert ext2 to use ->perform_write. This uses the main loop out of
> generic_perform_write, but when encountering a short usercopy, it
> zeroes out new uninitialised blocks, and passes in a short-length commit
> to __block_commit_write, which does the right thing (in terms of not
> setting things uptodate).
>
> fs/buffer.c | 143 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> fs/ext2/inode.c | 7 ++
> include/linux/buffer_head.h | 1
> include/linux/pagemap.h | 2
> 4 files changed, 153 insertions(+)
>
> Index: linux-2.6/fs/buffer.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/fs/buffer.c
> +++ linux-2.6/fs/buffer.c
> @@ -1866,6 +1866,50 @@ next_bh:
> return err;
> }
>
> +void page_zero_new_buffers(struct page *page, unsigned from, unsigned to)
> +{
> + unsigned int block_start, block_end;
> + struct buffer_head *head, *bh;
> +
> + BUG_ON(!PageLocked(page));
> + if (!page_has_buffers(page))
> + return;
> +
> + bh = head = page_buffers(page);
> + block_start = 0;
> + do {
> + block_end = block_start + bh->b_size;
> +
> + if (buffer_new(bh)) {
> + if (block_end > from && block_start < to) {
> + if (!PageUptodate(page)) {
> + unsigned start, end;
> + void *kaddr;
> +
> + start = max(from, block_start);
> + end = min(to, block_end);
> +
> + kaddr = kmap_atomic(page, KM_USER0);
> + memset(kaddr+start, 0, block_end-end);
> + flush_dcache_page(page);
> + kunmap_atomic(kaddr, KM_USER0);
> + set_buffer_uptodate(bh);
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * XXX: make buffer_new behaviour more
> + * consistent.
> + * clear_buffer_new(bh);
> + */
> + mark_buffer_dirty(bh);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + block_start = block_end;
> + bh = bh->b_this_page;
> + } while (bh != head);
> +}
> +
> static int __block_commit_write(struct inode *inode, struct page *page,
> unsigned from, unsigned to)
> {
> @@ -1900,6 +1944,105 @@ static int __block_commit_write(struct i
> return 0;
> }
>
> +ssize_t block_perform_write(struct file *file, struct iovec_iterator *i,
> + loff_t pos, get_block_t *get_block)
> +{
> + struct address_space *mapping = file->f_mapping;
> + struct inode *inode = mapping->host;
> + long status = 0;
> + ssize_t written = 0;
> +
> + do {
> + struct page *page;
> + pgoff_t index; /* Pagecache index for current page */
> + unsigned long offset; /* Offset into pagecache page */
> + unsigned long bytes; /* Bytes to write to page */
> + size_t copied; /* Bytes copied from user */
> +
> + offset = (pos & (PAGE_CACHE_SIZE - 1));
> + index = pos >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
> + bytes = min_t(unsigned long, PAGE_CACHE_SIZE - offset,
> + iovec_iterator_count(i));
> +
> + /*
> + * Bring in the user page that we will copy from _first_.
> + * Otherwise there's a nasty deadlock on copying from the
> + * same page as we're writing to, without it being marked
> + * up-to-date.
> + *
> + * Not only is this an optimisation, but it is also required
> + * to check that the address is actually valid, when atomic
> + * usercopies are used, below.
> + */
> + if (unlikely(iovec_iterator_fault_in_readable(i))) {
> + status = -EFAULT;
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + page = __grab_cache_page(mapping, index);
> + if (!page) {
> + status = -ENOMEM;
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + status = __block_prepare_write(inode, page, offset,
> + offset+bytes, get_block);
> + if (unlikely(status)) {
> + ClearPageUptodate(page);
> +
> + page_cache_release(page);
> +
> + /*
> + * prepare_write() may have instantiated a few blocks
> + * outside i_size. Trim these off again. Don't need
> + * i_size_read because we hold i_mutex.
> + */
> + if (pos + bytes > inode->i_size)
> + vmtruncate(inode, inode->i_size);
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * Must not enter the pagefault handler here, because
> + * we hold the page lock. See mm/filemap.c for more
> + * details.
> + */
> + pagefault_disable();
> + copied = iovec_iterator_copy_from_user_atomic(page, i,
> + offset, bytes);
> + pagefault_enable();
> + if (unlikely(copied < bytes))
> + page_zero_new_buffers(page, offset+copied, offset+bytes);
> + flush_dcache_page(page);
> +
<<<<<<<<<<< here fs cat do some fs-specific stuff without making
internal state visiable. cool.
> + /* This could be a short (even 0-length) commit */
> + __block_commit_write(inode, page, offset, offset+copied);
> +
> + unlock_page(page);
> + mark_page_accessed(page);
> + page_cache_release(page);
> +
> + iovec_iterator_advance(i, copied);
> + pos += copied;
> + written += copied;
> +
> + balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited(mapping);
> + cond_resched();
> +
> + } while (iovec_iterator_count(i));
> +
<<<<<<<<<<< If i've understand correctly folowing scenario possible:
iteration 1: ->iovec_iterator_fault_in_readable(...) = 0
iteration 1: __block_prepare_write = {blocks allocated}
iteration 1: iovec_iterator_copy_from_user_atomic(...) = 0
iteration 1: while(iovec_iterator_count(i)) == goto next loop

iteration 2: ->iovec_iterator_fault_in_readable(...) = -EFAULT
Than breack loop .
At this point prepare_write() may have instantiated a few blocks
outside i_size on iteration(1) So we have to trim these off again.

> + /*
> + * No need to use i_size_read() here, the i_size
> + * cannot change under us because we hold i_mutex.
> + */
> + if (pos > inode->i_size) {
> + i_size_write(inode, pos);
> + mark_inode_dirty(inode);
> + }
> +
> + return written ? written : status;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Generic "read page" function for block devices that have the normal
> * get_block functionality. This is most of the block device filesystems.
> Index: linux-2.6/fs/ext2/inode.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/fs/ext2/inode.c
> +++ linux-2.6/fs/ext2/inode.c
> @@ -642,6 +642,12 @@ ext2_readpages(struct file *file, struct
> return mpage_readpages(mapping, pages, nr_pages, ext2_get_block);
> }
>
> +static ssize_t
> +ext2_perform_write(struct file *file, struct iovec_iterator *i, loff_t pos)
> +{
> + return block_perform_write(file, i, pos, ext2_get_block);
> +}
> +
> static int
> ext2_prepare_write(struct file *file, struct page *page,
> unsigned from, unsigned to)
> @@ -689,6 +695,7 @@ const struct address_space_operations ex
> .readpages = ext2_readpages,
> .writepage = ext2_writepage,
> .sync_page = block_sync_page,
> + .perform_write = ext2_perform_write,
> .prepare_write = ext2_prepare_write,
> .commit_write = generic_commit_write,
> .bmap = ext2_bmap,
> Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/buffer_head.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/buffer_head.h
> +++ linux-2.6/include/linux/buffer_head.h
> @@ -198,6 +198,7 @@ void block_invalidatepage(struct page *p
> int block_write_full_page(struct page *page, get_block_t *get_block,
> struct writeback_control *wbc);
> int block_read_full_page(struct page*, get_block_t*);
> +ssize_t block_perform_write(struct file *, struct iovec_iterator*, loff_t, get_block_t*);
> int block_prepare_write(struct page*, unsigned, unsigned, get_block_t*);
> int cont_prepare_write(struct page*, unsigned, unsigned, get_block_t*,
> loff_t *);
> Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/pagemap.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/pagemap.h
> +++ linux-2.6/include/linux/pagemap.h
> @@ -87,6 +87,8 @@ unsigned find_get_pages_contig(struct ad
> unsigned find_get_pages_tag(struct address_space *mapping, pgoff_t *index,
> int tag, unsigned int nr_pages, struct page **pages);
>
> +struct page *__grab_cache_page(struct address_space *mapping, pgoff_t index);
> +
> /*
> * Returns locked page at given index in given cache, creating it if needed.
> */
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-02-08 15:49    [W:0.188 / U:0.588 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site