lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Feb]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 2 of 4] Introduce i386 fibril scheduling
    From
    From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
    Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 12:46:11 -0800 (PST)

    > And for user space, it means that we pass the _one_ thing around that we
    > need for both identifying the async operation to the kernel (the "cookie")
    > for wait or cancel, and the place where we expect the return value to be
    > found (which in turn can _easily_ represent a whole "struct aiocb *",
    > since the return value obviously has to be embedded in there anyway).

    I really think that Evgeniy's kevent is a good event notification
    mechanism for anything, including AIO.

    Events are events, applications want a centralized way to receive and
    process them.

    It's already implemented, and if there are tangible problems with it,
    Evgeniy has been excellent at responding to criticism and implementing
    suggested changes to the interfaces.
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-02-06 22:19    [W:4.954 / U:0.008 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site