lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Feb]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Problem with freezable workqueues
On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 12:57:35AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > How about other kthread_stop()s ? For example, kernel/softirq.c:cpu_callback() ?
>
> They all are PF_NOFREEZE, I suppose. If we make all workqueues nonfreezable
> (as they were before), the problem won't appear.

We can just thaw the worker thread selectively before kthread_stopping
them. This will let us freeze all worker threads (which we want to for
hotplug anyway).

> > I think we need a general "cpu_down() after freeze" implementation, this is what
> > Gautham and Srivatsa are working on, right?
>
> Yes, certainly.

Hmm ..good point. So can we assume that disable/enable_nonboot_cpus() are called
with processes frozen already?

Gautham, you need to take this into account in your patchset!

> > I'm afraid this is racy. We can't touch *cwq, it may be freed. Suppose
> > that another thread does destroy_workqueue(), and we thaw that thread
> > before cwq->thread.
>
> Okay, in that case I'd suggest removing create_freezeable_workqueue() and
> make all workqueues nonfreezable once again for 2.6.21 (as far as I know, only
> the two XFS workqueues are affected).

See above suggestion of thawing worker thread before kthread_stopping
it.

--
Regards,
vatsa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-02-28 04:09    [W:0.804 / U:0.056 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site