Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: RFC/patch: down_timeout_interruptible() | From | Arjan van de Ven <> | Date | Sun, 25 Feb 2007 07:45:54 +0100 |
| |
> I gave it a quick try (must admit, not too tested) and it seems that > the setting of TIF_SIGPENDING without really having a signal queued > is not having easily visible ugly consequences.
what happens if you get a signal around the time the timeout fires?
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |