lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Feb]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 00/44 take 2] [UBI] Unsorted Block Images
    On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 07:07:46PM +0200, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
    > > And when you create that many interfaces, it adds inertia to changing
    > > the interfaces later on, because it's sometimes not clear how many
    > > users of the interface there really are. My general rule of thumb is
    > > that if an interface only has one user, then it may be a good idea to
    > > combine it with the user of that interface, and then make the
    > > functions involved be a static, so that it becomes clear the only user
    > > of that functoin is within that one file. You can take this too far,
    > > and to extremes it doesn't work all that well, but the UBI layer has
    > > gone waaaaaay off the deep end in terms of functional decomposition.
    >
    > Well... I do not want any flame on this topic. It is about taste,
    > trade-offs, compromises. It is difficult to provide _objective_ and
    > killing arguments here. But I will think on this, point taken, thanks.

    Codingstyle is and always will be about tastes, but it usually helps a lot
    if you try to understand and follow the style of the project you want
    to contribute to :)
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-02-25 06:55    [W:0.023 / U:90.040 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site