lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Feb]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: SLUB: The unqueued Slab allocator
From
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@engr.sgi.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 09:32:49 -0800 (PST)

> On Fri, 23 Feb 2007, David Miller wrote:
>
> > I also agree with Andi in that merging could mess up how object type
> > local lifetimes help reduce fragmentation in object pools.
>
> If that is a problem for particular object pools then we may be able to
> except those from the merging.

If it is a problem, it's going to be a problem "in general"
and not for specific SLAB caches.

I think this is really a very unwise idea. We have enough
fragmentation problems as it is.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-02-25 01:55    [W:0.076 / U:0.068 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site