lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Feb]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectPREEMP_ACTIVE in cond_resched
cond_resched() checks and conditionally sets PREEMPT_ACTIVE flag for
the current task. The comments says,

/*
* The BKS might be reacquired before we have dropped
* PREEMPT_ACTIVE, which could trigger a second
* cond_resched() call.
*/

My understanding is that cond_resched() would be indirectly invoked
twice recursively, through the following path,

cond_resched() -> schedule() -> reacquire_kernel_lock() -> down() ->
might_sleep() -> might_resched() -> cond_resched().

However, the above path is possible only in a voluntary-preemptive
kernel. In a full-preemptive kernel, I do not find any possible path
to cause recursive cond_resched(). Does that mean we can actually
remove the check and setting of PREEMPT_ACTIVE for a full-preemptive
kernel?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-02-22 04:03    [W:0.022 / U:0.152 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site