lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Feb]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [Xen-devel] Re: [patch 17/24] Xen-paravirt_ops: avoid having a bad selector in %gs during context switch
Andi Kleen wrote:
>> /*
>> + * Temporary hack: zero gs now that we've saved it so that Xen
>> + * doesn't try to reload the old value after changing the GDT
>> + * during the context switch. This can go away once Xen has
>> + * been taught to only reload %gs when it absolutely must.
>> + */
>> + loadsegment(gs, 0);
>>
>
> Sorry, but i don't really want that unconditionally in the context switch.
> Adding a paravirt ops for it would be also ugly. Can Xen be fixed?
>

I agree with that, but especially because this is not even the right
place to save and clear gs; when userspace uses an LDT based %gs, you
need to do this all the way back in mmu_context.h before you switch the
LDT out. We have the same bug, but I was loathe to try to fix it yet,
since it could mean some strange code movement. The awkward bit is that
switch_mm doesn't have the pointer to the previous task, only it's mm,
so there is no place to save gs. Perhaps it is time to move the LDT
switch into switch_to instead of switch_mm? It's not like there are
different per-process LDTs in the fixmap or something, which I could see
as a valid reason to associate this with the mm switch. But all process
LDTs are global, so there isn't an issue.

And I noticed this martian hanging out in mmu_context.h:

#define deactivate_mm(tsk, mm) \
asm("movl %0,%%gs": :"r" (0));

Zach
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-02-22 00:29    [W:0.057 / U:0.280 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site