Messages in this thread |  | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/7] [RFC] hugetlb: pagetable_operations API | From | Benjamin Herrenschmidt <> | Date | Wed, 21 Feb 2007 06:54:57 +1100 |
| |
On Mon, 2007-02-19 at 19:43 +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On Mon, 2007-02-19 at 10:31 -0800, Adam Litke wrote: > > The page tables for hugetlb mappings are handled differently than page tables > > for normal pages. Rather than integrating multiple page size support into the > > main VM (which would tremendously complicate the code) some hooks were created. > > This allows hugetlb special cases to be handled "out of line" by a separate > > interface. > > ok it makes sense to clean this up.. what I don't like is that there > STILL are all the double cases... for this to work and be worth it both > the common case and the hugetlb case should be using the ops structure > always! Anything else and you're just replacing bad code with bad > code ;(
I don't fully agree. I think it makes sense to have the "special" case be a function pointer and the "normal" case stay where it is for performances. You don't want to pay the cost of the function pointer call in the normal case do you ?
Ben.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |