Messages in this thread Patch in this message |  | | Date | Mon, 19 Feb 2007 00:43:59 +0300 | From | Oleg Nesterov <> | Subject | [PATCH 1/3] net/bridge/br_if.c: don't use _WORK_NAR |
| |
Afaics, noautorel work_struct buys nothing for "struct net_bridge_port".
If del_nbp()->cancel_delayed_work(&p->carrier_check) fails, port_carrier_check may be called later anyway. So the reading of *work in port_carrier_check() is equally unsafe with or without this patch.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
--- WQ/net/bridge/br_if.c~1_bridge 2007-02-18 22:56:49.000000000 +0300 +++ WQ/net/bridge/br_if.c 2007-02-18 23:06:15.000000000 +0300 @@ -85,7 +85,6 @@ static void port_carrier_check(struct wo dev = container_of(work, struct net_bridge_port, carrier_check.work)->dev; - work_release(work); rtnl_lock(); p = dev->br_port; @@ -282,7 +281,7 @@ static struct net_bridge_port *new_nbp(s p->port_no = index; br_init_port(p); p->state = BR_STATE_DISABLED; - INIT_DELAYED_WORK_NAR(&p->carrier_check, port_carrier_check); + INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&p->carrier_check, port_carrier_check); br_stp_port_timer_init(p); kobject_init(&p->kobj); - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |