lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Feb]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: GPL vs non-GPL device drivers
    Hello!

    > Assuming these need not be GPL, I have a problem with
    > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL and the general trend in the direction of making
    > proprietary drivers harder on companies.

    Most kernel developers did always say they don't agree with proprietary
    drivers, don't want to support them and that they are convinced such
    drivers are illegal. And according to the language of the GPL and the
    copyright law, it's quite possible they really are illegal (although
    a court _might_ rule that the modules are not a derived work of the
    kernel). Even with all that, you still decided to distribute such
    modules. What you are complaining about?

    > So why beat about the bush? Just make it illegal to load proprietary
    > drivers, or remove EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL.

    The point is that it's impossible to make it illegal (although many of
    the authors of the kernel would like to) -- the point is that if kernel
    modules aren't derivative works of the kernel, the kernel license cannot
    control them.

    Have a nice fortnight
    --
    Martin `MJ' Mares <mj@ucw.cz> http://mj.ucw.cz/
    Faculty of Math and Physics, Charles University, Prague, Czech Rep., Earth
    This mail doesn't contain viruses, because it wasn't sent from MS Windows. Checked by eyes.
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-02-16 09:39    [W:4.470 / U:0.104 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site