[lkml]   [2007]   [Feb]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch 11/21] Xen-paravirt: Add apply_to_page_range() which applies a function to a pte range.
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 23:06:45 -0800 Jeremy Fitzhardinge <> wrote:

> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 18:25:00 -0800 Jeremy Fitzhardinge <> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Add a new mm function apply_to_page_range()[...]
> > There was some discussion about this sort of thing last week. The
> > consensus was that it's better to run the callback against a whole pmd's
> > worth of ptes, mainly to amortise the callback's cost (a lot).
> >
> > It was implemented in
> >
> Yes I was looking at that and wondering what the upshot would be. I'll
> have a closer look, but it seems like it should be usable.

It's a question of who-merges-first. I wasn't planning on merging the
smaps stuff into 2.6.21.

Perhaps the best approach is to proceed as-is and clean things up once it's
all merged.

I guess your pte-at-a-time walker could be quite simply implemented underneath
the smaps pmd-at-a-time walker.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-02-16 08:23    [W:0.087 / U:2.812 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site