Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Fri, 16 Feb 2007 13:13:43 -0800 (PST) | From | Christoph Lameter <> | Subject | Re: [patch 00/21] Xen-paravirt: Xen guest implementation for paravirt_ops interface |
| |
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007, Zachary Amsden wrote:
> For the most part, it doesn't disturb VMware or KVM. Xen does need some > additional functionality in paravirt-ops because they took a different design > choice - direct page tables instead of shadow page tables. This is where all > the requirements for the new Xen paravirt-ops hooks come from.
It still seems to be implemented for Xen and not to support a variety of page table methods in paravirt ops.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |