lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Feb]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [Xen-devel] Re: [patch 12/21] Xen-paravirt: Allocate and free vmalloc areas
From
On 16/2/07 17:27, "Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <jeremy@goop.org> wrote:

> In fact that file is only built for i386 and x86_64, so there really is no
>> problem with using vmalloc_sync_all() directly and without ifdef.
>>
>
> I had moved it to mm/vmalloc.c in response to previous review comments
> (namely, its not Xen specific, so it shouldn't live in the Xen part of
> the tree).

Then the call will have to be CONFIG_X86. I hadn't realised powerpc were
also using lock_vm_area. However I suspect that the x86 issue that those
functions were written doesn't even exist on powerpc, or any other non-x86
architecture.

I guess we should change the name of alloc_vm_area, by the way. Perhaps
alloc_vm_area_sync() or similar, to give some hint of what it's doing and
how it differs from other vmalloc-area functions?

-- Keir

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-02-16 20:11    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans