[lkml]   [2007]   [Feb]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: GPL vs non-GPL device drivers
    Xavier Bestel wrote:
    > On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 21:48 -0800, v j wrote:
    >> We only get crap because no one here yet knows how to interpret
    >> proprietary modules loaded into the kernel.
    > The proprietary modules where only a tiny wrapper is linux-specific and
    > the rest is cross-platform are in a grey area, yes.
    > But your modules, written specifically for linux but distributed as
    > binary-only, are specifically what the people choosing the GPL want to
    > avoid. They are a derivative work, and are, as such, illegal under the
    > GPL.

    If they are a derivative work, they are illegal under the GPL. However,
    it is not clear that their being written specifically *for* Linux is
    sufficient to make them derivative works *of* Linux.

    Jon Kåre
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-02-16 11:17    [W:0.020 / U:0.900 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site