lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Feb]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: SATA-performance: Linux vs. FreeBSD
From
Date
On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 12:18 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> writes:
>
> > > >
> > > The problem is: FreeBSD is fast, but lacks of some special drivers. Linux has
> > > all drivers but access to harddisk is unpredictable and thus unreliable!
> > > What can I do??
> >
> >
> > there's several tunables you can do;
>
> [...] Well Linux certainly should perform better out of the box
> on such a simple configuration.

no argument from me there; first need to find out which piece is wrong
>
> Something is wrong especially when the CPU usage is so high.

I'll buy that, yet there's plenty of cpu time available so that
shouldn't be all that much of a limit on the throughput... there's still
headroom

--
if you want to mail me at work (you don't), use arjan (at) linux.intel.com
Test the interaction between Linux and your BIOS via http://www.linuxfirmwarekit.org

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-02-13 11:27    [W:0.336 / U:0.004 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site