[lkml]   [2007]   [Feb]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [RFC] [PATCH] more support for memory-less-node.

    > Your description of the node is correct, it's an arbitrary container of
    > one or more resources. Not only is this definition flexible, it's also
    > very useful, for memory hotplug, odd types of NUMA boxes, etc.

    I must disagree here. Special cases are always dangerous especially
    if they are hard to regression test. I made this discovery the hard
    way on x86-64 ... It's best to eliminate them in the first place,
    otherwise they will later come back and bite you when you don't expect it.

    Adding NULL tests all over mm for this would seem like a clear case
    of this to me.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-02-13 18:53    [W:0.020 / U:113.976 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site